Orienting the Conversation: Ethical Principles
- Beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice, per APA, NASW, ACA, AAMFT
- “Saving children” vs. parents’ rights and professional autonomy
- Social and racial justice as components of the justice principle
- Limitations of the research and potential risks
How We Got Here: The History Behind the Law
- Origins of mandated reporting
- Original laws vs. today’s system: 150,000 reports in 1963 to 4.4 million in 2020
- What CPS was designed to do, and what it can’t do
The Current State of Disproportionality
- Report sources and substantiation rates
- Socioeconomic status and the “visibility” or poor families
- Competing theories: visibility bias, implicit and explicit racial bias
- Racial disproportionality vs. racial disparity
Tracing the Roots of Disproportionate Impact
- Macro Level: Civil rights movement, neo-liberalism, political systems
- Mezzo Level: Community resources, connections, agency practice
- Micro Level: Child protector vs. mandated supporter, your own bias
A Framework for “Just” Reporting
- Legal responsibility to report
- When suspicions are required to be reported & when they are not
- Challenging legal requirements
- Abolition movement
- Evaluate influence of personal lenses to reporting decision
- Ethical responsibility for just practice
- Ethical responsibilities when report is made
- Ethical responsibilities when report is not made
- Case examples & application of framework


